Quote:
Would all Irish speakers accept that, let's say, Cois Farraige be chosen and be taught in all schools?
probably more than those who accept that an artificial non-Gaeltacht dialect replaces the native language.
Quote:
Normally artificial dialects are created because they can contain elements from all major dialects, so everyone's partly represented. They also have the advantage that the standard can be updated to reflect how its native speakers use it, which is important because languages evolve. If half a million people start speaking Cois Farraige (the dialect), it won't stay forever identical to what's heard on the roads of Cois Farraige (the place).
what's the difference? If it's artificial, it will evolve. If it's a native dialect, it will evolve too.
Quote:
Lughaidh wrote:
Gaeltacht speakers could believe that their Irish is wrong
This shouldn't be a problem. In the Netherlands, Flanders, the German-speaking parts of Switzerland, and most of Germany people speak dialect at home and a standardised dialect at school and they've no problem maintaining their dialects.
Yes but German isn't endangered, while Irish is. So Irish speakers may have a complex because their Irish is never taught and never written, and even though they speak Irish at home, what they say is considered "wrong" at school because it's not standard. German-speaking people have no reason to change language, while Irish is under the constant pressure of English, almost all Irish speakers are bilingual so it's easy to abandon Irish. It happens all the time actually, since the number of Irish native speakers decreases every year.
Quote:
Lughaidh wrote:
before the CO, Gaeltacht writers would write in their dialect and it was awesome.
Everything else I read says the language was at risk of going extinct. If we're to fix problems, we first have to accept that problems exist.
Have I said the contrary? What's the connection between my sentence and yours?