galaxyrocker wrote:
WeeFalorieMan wrote:
Ironically, "Conas atá tú" is not said in any native dialect – none that I am aware of, anyway.
I'm not an expert on Munster Irish (An Lon Dubh?), but I believe that's right. Which just makes it even funnier.
Conas 'tá tú was supposedly used in Dublin before it died out.
It seems to have been used as the Manx form also (from a guess):
Kys t'ou? (sg) Cé+is(as)* 'tá t(h)ú
Kanys ta shiu? (pl) Cén is .../Conas 'tá ...
*Conas (Cion(n)as) itself, I would guess, originated from Cia (Cé) + n + relative copula
asgalaxyrocker wrote:
I'm slowly getting there with my (what I hope is) South Connemara Irish. It's getting harder for me to use rachaidh for example, and I'm even starting to use uaidh in place of ó. I call that a good thing, though.

before long you won't be able to realise your doing it and eventually you'll forget the standard form

.
galaxyrocker wrote:
An Lon Dubh wrote:
(a) I am from X
This is what it was, despite the person being from a county
other than Donegal. They tried to make an argument that because speakers existed elsewhere in Ulster there was a true 'Ulster Irish' that wasn't exclusive to Donegal, despite the only native speakers being in Donegal.
This argument is used a lot by urban speakers of Irish, a lot of people believe that their accent and the way they pronounce Hiberno-English is somehow reflective of the actual Irish spoken in the region before it died out. While they may have certain features in common, it is rarely the case. As many of the sounds that are essential to Irish don't exist in English.
I think everyone has experienced the "because I live in X then I speak the Irish of X". I've had conversations with "Munster Speakers" (who attended a Gaelscoil) where they believed the word Gaoluinn (Gaeluinn) didn't exist, and the Munster word for Irish was Gaeilge.
galaxyrocker wrote:
An Lon Dubh wrote:
Also I should say that people's sensitivity to dialect forms makes me wonder if they ever really read Irish, where you see dialectal forms all the time. I mean Goidé is extremely common even in local annuals or modern biographies.
The thing is they really don't. Or, if they do, they're reading mostly standard Irish stuff aimed at kids in school and whatnot. Though, that said, I'm currently reading
Mise Raiftearaí, and Mac Dhonnagáin is using dialectal forms for some things --
sa eclipses, use of
feilm and some other dialectal spellings at times. But, yeah. I'm not even that familiar with Donegal Irish, but I knew of
goidé and
caidé. Personally, I love to see dialects, because it helps me learn more about true spoken Irish, not "learner's Irish".
Its just pure ignorance really.
Also, I think there is this really fucked up judgement complex surrounding Irish, which fosters the belief in peoples' minds that if they have never heard some form or seen some form in a "authoritative" grammar/ CO learning book then it must be wrong. When in actual fact 'deviant' forms are often hundreds of years old and sometimes even older than the accepted form.
This is nothing new though, many native speakers 100-200 years ago, when they were compiling grammars etc..., would also automatically think that forms they were not accustomed to were incorrect or poor Irish. You can't bate a good aul' dose of tribalism

.
galaxyrocker wrote:
Overall, it was just a really frustrating conversation... That then further deteriorated by the person saying something along the lines of "Irish is my native language. My brain is hardwired for it, not English." and the whole claim about Irish being their native language because they're from Ireland.
The old
non sequitur of I am a "native" of Ireland therefore Irish is my "native language" argument.
galaxyrocker wrote:
I should also say that this isn't my first interaction like this with this person. We got into a heated debate over whether there should be an emphasis on translations or original content --- they prefer translations, of course, because there's apparently not enough speakers to use/create original content. I'm a fan of original Irish content. And then we got into a big debate of whether or not there was an Ulster Irish outside of Donegal Irish.
That's not surprising, a lot of people prefer to read translations. Not only because they are probably familiar with the material and they prefer the
genre, but also because translations can often become highly corrupted by the syntax of the original language (usually English), especially if the translator's first language is also the original language of the piece of work (usually English). If your first language is English then it is obviously going to be easier to understand a translated piece than grappling with works by authors whose first language was Irish and may not have been able to speak English that well or at all.
People who believe they have "excellent" Irish will often get a shock when they are presented with the works of traditional native Irish speakers, and that's even after you account for the fact that a lot of the concepts and vocabulary discussed are alien to more contemporary audiences (even in English), e.g. cailíní/ buachaillí aimsire (which have been contorted to mean things like 'prostitute' today, when their original meaning was something more like 'boys/ girls who were sent away to do seasoned work', i.e. over the summer holidays/ harvest season), names for plants and wildlife, meitheal etc...
Cian
_________________
Is Fearr súil romhainn ná ḋá ṡúil inár ndiaiḋ
(Amhlaoibh Ó Súilleabháin)
Please wait for corrections/ more input from other forum members before acting on advice
I'm familiar with Munster Irish/ Gaolainn na Mumhan (GM) and the Official Standard/an Caighdeán Oifigiúil (CO)