It is currently Fri 21 Aug 2026 6:02 am

All times are UTC


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 74 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: 'cac' = sh*t or poo?
PostPosted: Fri 06 Apr 2012 3:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon 29 Aug 2011 4:54 pm
Posts: 3444
Location: Cill Dara
Apologies if the title offended anyone, but it is useful to make it clear what a question is about in the title of the thread. I tried to be delicate by inserting the '*' instead of the clearly offensive 'i'. :mrgreen:

My question relates to suitability of usage with children. I would happily use the word 'poo' in English with a child, but would refrain from saying 'shit' as it seems a little (or very) inappropriate. Is 'cac' more like shit or poo? I'm thinking 'shit' and have avoided it, but actually am unsure.

Shit stirrers are welcome in on this one! Alternative words for delicately expressing number twos are welcome also! :twisted:

_________________
Is foghlaimeoir mé. I am a learner. DEFINITELY wait for others to confirm and/or improve.
Beatha teanga í a labhairt.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'cac' = sh*t or poo?
PostPosted: Fri 06 Apr 2012 3:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun 28 Aug 2011 8:29 pm
Posts: 2999
Saoirse wrote:
Apologies if the title offended anyone, but it is useful to make it clear what a question is about in the title of the thread. I tried to be delicate by inserting the '*' instead of the clearly offensive 'i'. :mrgreen:

My question relates to suitability of usage with children. I would happily use the word 'poo' in English with a child, but would refrain from saying 'shit' as it seems a little (or very) inappropriate. Is 'cac' more like shit or poo? I'm thinking 'shit' and have avoided it, but actually am unsure.

Shit stirrers are welcome in on this one! Alternative words for delicately expressing number twos are welcome also! :twisted:


Irish doesn't have the same taboos with such words as English does.
So "cac" is used for all the English terms; shit, poo, excrement etc.
You could use it as a deminitive - caicín maybe
Same with similar words, for urine, sex etc. No need to come up with euphemisms for them.
Although when I was little we used "tobarín" (little well) for urinating. But I realised later it was just a family thing. :D

_________________
___________________________________________________________

It is recommended that you always wait for three to agree on a translation.
I speak Connemara Irish, and my input will often reflect that.
I will do an mp3 file on request for short translations.

___________________________________________________________


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'cac' = sh*t or poo?
PostPosted: Fri 06 Apr 2012 3:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon 29 Aug 2011 4:54 pm
Posts: 3444
Location: Cill Dara
'caicín' almost sounds cute until you think about what it is! I quite like it as an option though.

Bríd Mhór wrote:
Although when I was little we used "tobarín" (little well) for urinating. But I realised later it was just a family thing.

Now, that really is cute!

_________________
Is foghlaimeoir mé. I am a learner. DEFINITELY wait for others to confirm and/or improve.
Beatha teanga í a labhairt.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'cac' = sh*t or poo?
PostPosted: Fri 06 Apr 2012 4:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 5:12 pm
Posts: 279
Location: Hamilton, NJ, USA
Bríd Mhór wrote:
Irish doesn't have the same taboos with such words as English does.
So "cac" is used for all the English terms; shit, poo, excrement etc.
You could use it as a deminitive - caicín maybe
Same with similar words, for urine, sex etc. No need to come up with euphemisms for them.
Although when I was little we used "tobarín" (little well) for urinating. But I realised later it was just a family thing. :D

I find Irish to be a much more sensible language than English in that respect. The prevalence of euphemisms in English is, to me, utterly ridiculous. That, no doubt, is my Irish half talking....

_________________
Táim ag foghlaim Gaelainn na Mumhan

Tá fáilte roim nach aon cheartú!
I am a learner. Any translations offered are practice and should not be used unless confirmed.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'cac' = sh*t or poo?
PostPosted: Fri 06 Apr 2012 4:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun 28 Aug 2011 8:44 pm
Posts: 3512
Location: Santa Cruz Mountains, California, USA
These euphemisms in English stem from how the language came to be.

As English was beginning to evolve into a single language incorporating both the language of the Saxons (who were, at the time, the peasant/serf class) and the language of the Normans (who were the upper class), with elements of the Latin of the educated class, different terms for the same thing began to evolve. If you wanted to sound vulgar, you used the peasant term ("shit"...which, like the Irish "cac," was the only word the Saxons had for the stuff). If you wanted to sound more refined (some would say "stuffy"), you used a word derived from Norman French: "excrement." And if you were being clinical, you used the Latin-derived "feces."

So now, when we're speaking to children, we're not sure what to do. "Shit" has become irretrievably vulgar in our culture. "Excrement" and "feces" sound too clinical. We're left with few options but to make up a "polite" term.

We see a lot of this kind of linguistic doublespeak in cooking and agricultural terms. For example, if you're speaking of the living animal (with which the peasant would have had to deal), you use the Saxon-derived: "cow," but if you're eating its meat (which would have been more available to the upper classes), you're eating the French-derived "beef." While "cow" wouldn't be considered a vulgar term in this context, it would seem odd if a waiter were to offer the the choice between "cow, ""pig" or "sheep" with your entree! Though, oddly, "chicken," "lamb," and "fish" seem to have escaped this trend!

Redwolf


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'cac' = sh*t or poo?
PostPosted: Fri 06 Apr 2012 5:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2011 12:06 pm
Posts: 2436
Quote:
We see a lot of this kind of linguistic doublespeak in cooking and agricultural terms. For example, if you're speaking of the living animal (with which the peasant would have had to deal), you use the Saxon-derived: "cow," but if you're eating its meat (which would have been more available to the upper classes), you're eating the French-derived "beef." While "cow" wouldn't be considered a vulgar term in this context, it would seem odd if a waiter were to offer the the choice between "cow, ""pig" or "sheep" with your entree! Though, oddly, "chicken," "lamb," and "fish" seem to have escaped this trend!


the strangest thing is that in French we don't have specific words for the meat as opposed to the living animals. So in English it wouldn't offend me to hear I eat sheep, ox or deer or pig meat :darklaugh:
I wonder why you have 2 series of words in English :)

_________________
Is fearr Gaeilg na Gaeltaċta ná Gaeilg ar biṫ eile
Agus is í Gaeilg Ġaoṫ Doḃair is binne
:)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'cac' = sh*t or poo?
PostPosted: Fri 06 Apr 2012 5:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun 28 Aug 2011 8:44 pm
Posts: 3512
Location: Santa Cruz Mountains, California, USA
Lughaidh wrote:
Quote:
We see a lot of this kind of linguistic doublespeak in cooking and agricultural terms. For example, if you're speaking of the living animal (with which the peasant would have had to deal), you use the Saxon-derived: "cow," but if you're eating its meat (which would have been more available to the upper classes), you're eating the French-derived "beef." While "cow" wouldn't be considered a vulgar term in this context, it would seem odd if a waiter were to offer the the choice between "cow, ""pig" or "sheep" with your entree! Though, oddly, "chicken," "lamb," and "fish" seem to have escaped this trend!


the strangest thing is that in French we don't have specific words for the meat as opposed to the living animals. So in English it wouldn't offend me to hear I eat sheep, ox or deer or pig meat :darklaugh:
I wonder why you have 2 series of words in English :)


It's because the French-derived words came to be associated with the upper classes, who were generally the ones who could afford to eat the animal, whereas the Saxon-derived words came to be associated with the animal itself. The French terms were considered more cultured. So the peasants raised "cows" and the masters ate "beef."

What I find interesting is that it isn't universal. You would sound odd ordering "sheep" in a restaurant (you'd use "mutton"), but if it's a young sheep you want, you'd sound perfectly normal ordering "lamb."

Redwolf


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'cac' = sh*t or poo?
PostPosted: Fri 06 Apr 2012 6:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2011 12:06 pm
Posts: 2436
Quote:
It's because the French-derived words came to be associated with the upper classes, who were generally the ones who could afford to eat the animal, whereas the Saxon-derived words came to be associated with the animal itself. The French terms were considered more cultured. So the peasants raised "cows" and the masters ate "beef."


I know, but why? The upper classes may have used the same words... and in other languages (well, those I know), people use the same words for living animals and for meat.
For instance, in Brittany the nobility would speak French and everybody else would speak Breton, and in Breton we use the same words for living animals and for meat, we just add the word "kig" (meat) before - just as we add "(f)eoil" in Irish (caoireoil, mairteoil, muiceoil...)

_________________
Is fearr Gaeilg na Gaeltaċta ná Gaeilg ar biṫ eile
Agus is í Gaeilg Ġaoṫ Doḃair is binne
:)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'cac' = sh*t or poo?
PostPosted: Fri 06 Apr 2012 7:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun 04 Sep 2011 11:02 pm
Posts: 1581
Interestingly, the EU has in some cases tried to alter the historical words in English. So, for example, you won't find "pork" mentioned in EU documents. Instead, it is "pig meat". They left beef alone, though. It's possible that the term "pig meat" was originally created for the uncooked meat being shipped from one place to another, but if so, then why not "cow meat" or "cattle meat" (to be less gender-oriented)?

Odd terminology like that arises in many situations, and it isn't always logical. In California, which produces a large share of the almonds in the US, the industry standard is to call them "amands" (slightly misspelled French term) while they are still on the tree, and then "almonds" when they are off the tree and being sold. Perhaps the earliest almond (or amand) growers here were French-speaking immigrants.

_________________
I'm not a native (or entirely fluent) speaker, so be sure to wait for confirmations/corrections, especially for tattoos.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'cac' = sh*t or poo?
PostPosted: Fri 06 Apr 2012 7:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon 29 Aug 2011 4:54 pm
Posts: 3444
Location: Cill Dara
What I think is interesting is that this thread started by talking about shit and has worked its way backwards to precisely what name we should call the stuff that created the shit in the first place. :twisted:
Not quite the intellectual discussion the rest of you were having. Continue on, please! :mrgreen:

_________________
Is foghlaimeoir mé. I am a learner. DEFINITELY wait for others to confirm and/or improve.
Beatha teanga í a labhairt.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 74 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 655 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group