Ceanntuigheoireacht6 wrote:
but personally I'd much rather Irish just died than a fragment of it living on in such a disrespectful fashion... but that's just me
Excuse for homing in on the one part of your text that could potentially have Irish people denouncing you. I wish the Irish "movement" were not like this. I am described on Twitter by many as argumentative (by Dennis King and others), totally ignoring the barrage that I have gone through for supporting traditional Irish. There is even an Englishman, Dave at 123 (I think), a English pensioner who was relegated to password-protected part of ILF for supporting traditional Irish. It is the supporters of the Caighdeán who are the argumentative and obnoxious ones.
I wrote this in the preface to Mo Scéal Féin:
Quote:
Interestingly, Ua Laoghaire himself did not argue that the supposed overriding importance of promoting any kind of Irish at all meant that the approach adopted did not matter. In the following passage of this work, Ua Laoghaire implies that it would not be worth promoting Irish if not done properly:
Bhí ’ fhios agam go dian‑mhaith gur mar sin ba cheart an obair a dhéanamh má bhí sí le déanamh in aon chor. [p201 in this edition; underlining added]
The full quote is:
Quote:
Do thuigeas ón gcainnt a bhí ar siúl, agus as na fógraí a thagadh amach, go raibh socair ar an nGaelainn bheó a bhí i mbéalaibh na ndaoine do shaothrú. Bhí ’ fhios agam go dian‑mhaith gur mar sin ba cheart an obair a dhéanamh má bhí sí le déanamh in aon chor.
Basically, Ua Laoghaire faced opposition from those who didn't want to base Irish on the Gaeltacht dialects (some of them back then wanted to return to Classical Irish of Keating's day). Ua Laoghaire wanted the cainnt na ndaoine of the Gaeltacht and didn't think it was worth having the Irish language otherwise.