It is currently Tue 30 Jun 2026 8:38 am

All times are UTC


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed 19 Nov 2014 12:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun 28 Aug 2011 8:44 pm
Posts: 3512
Location: Santa Cruz Mountains, California, USA
http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/adopt ... ign=buffer


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed 19 Nov 2014 12:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue 15 Nov 2011 7:35 am
Posts: 1098
Interesting and it would be great to have more detailed scanning tech so as to know just how the response is the same and how it is different

_________________
__̴ı̴̴̡̡̡ ̡͌l̡̡̡ ̡͌l̡*̡̡ ̴̡ı̴̴̡ ̡̡͡|̲̲̲͡͡͡ ̲▫̲͡ ̲̲̲͡͡π̲̲͡͡ ̲̲͡▫̲̲͡͡ ̲|̡̡̡ ̡ ̴̡ı̴̡̡ ̡͌l̡̡̡̡.___


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed 19 Nov 2014 4:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun 28 Aug 2011 8:44 pm
Posts: 3512
Location: Santa Cruz Mountains, California, USA
It would also be interesting to do a followup study to see if this makes the ability to learn the mother language (Mandarin, in this case) easier when the children are older.

Redwolf


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed 19 Nov 2014 5:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed 19 Dec 2012 3:58 pm
Posts: 488
Redwolf wrote:
It would also be interesting to do a followup study to see if this makes the ability to learn the mother language (Mandarin, in this case) easier when the children are older.

From the article:
Quote:
But Klein noted that the study is a preliminary one and the researchers don't yet know what the results mean.

For example, would adopted children exposed to Chinese in infancy have an easier time relearning Chinese later, compared with monolingual French-speaking children who were learning it for the first time?

Pierce said studies trying to figure that out have had mixed results, but she hopes the findings in this study could generate better ways to tackle that question.

There's been lots of studies that attempted to find a link between early childhood exposure and later mastery, but there's been no reliable consistency in the results.

As for more detailed scanning, well, the technology is always improving, but there is a limit to how precise you can be when every individual brain is different.

But the wording of part of the blurb on the journal's website is very strong:
Quote:
displayed brain activation to Chinese linguistic elements that precisely matched that of native Chinese speakers

(my emphasis)

The same part of the brain, the same level of activity... it's very, very significant.

If there was any finer resolution, I don't think we'd be able to interpret the differences with our current understanding of neurology....

_________________
A language belongs to its native speakers, and when you speak it, you are a guest in their homes.
If you are not a good guest, you have no right to complain about receiving poor hospitality.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Labhrás and 433 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group