Grma a Bhríd.
Quote:
Since there _are_ historical precedents for these forms in Old Irish (and in all Irish since then), the claim that these are "Germanic" forms is incorrect and generally based on prejudice rather than fact.
The question is: would native Modern Irish speakers create and use such words in their normal speech? I don't think so.
Quote:
Moreover, the only people I have heard complain about it are a French scholar and one native speaker, but it can by no means be assumed that _all_ native speakers reject the compound forms.
these words have been coined and then imposed to all speakers through school "official" terminology, books etc. Would all native speakers reject them? I don't know (they've got used to them), but would they have created them?...
Quote:
Thus, your assertion of "fact" is merely your own opinion, Lughaidh. Don't get over-emphatic about it.
it would be interesting to make a survey on that topic, by asking to Gaeltacht people how they would say this or that... Even studying the percentage of contráilte compound words in the Irish prose before the CO was created. And compare with today's Irish language newspapers, websites etc. I think it would be funny.
Quote:
My view is that having both forms enriches the language. If you choose to use one form and not the other that is your prerogative, but attacking people who use the compound forms is both mímhúinte and drochmhúinte.
the problem is that people can't choose, the bunoscionn compound words are imposed to them. Along with Standard Irish of course, because all these artificial things belong to the same movement.
Nobody asks "do you prefer Gaelscoil" or "Scoil Ghaeilge"? Gaelscéal or Scéal Gaelach? etc etc. The contráilte words are imposed to people.